PanRomance Orthography?

The place to discuss constructed writing systems (con-scripts)

PanRomance Orthography?

Postby Azura » Sun 31 Jan 2010 6:56 am

Please suggest me the letter for phonemes for this orthography.
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu 13 Aug 2009 5:29 am

Re: PanRomance Orthography?

Postby linguoboy » Sun 31 Jan 2010 7:51 am

Azura wrote:Please suggest me the letter for phonemes for this orthography.

Why? I'm not sure I even see what the point of such an orthography would be.
Posts: 1029
Joined: Sun 19 Apr 2009 9:02 am

Re: PanRomance Orthography?

Postby kajzeren » Sun 28 Feb 2010 2:46 am

If you think in a "neolatin alphabet", normativizing letter use (like, "ch" always for /tS/ sound, "sh" always for /S/, etc.), it's plausible but not desired. The alphabet would lose flexibility, we would need to abuse digraphs or create about 20 new graphemes...

If you think in something far more radical - writing all of them as one language, it's just making a Vulgar Latin orthography, really :D . It's more plausible, however, defeats the very reason to use an alphabet: phoneme-grapheme correlation.
sölvm magnvm homö potest esse quandö rëses nvnqvam prae vïdërunt creat.
(A human being can only be great when creat what was never seen before.)
User avatar
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed 12 Aug 2009 2:20 am
Location: bananae res pvblica

Return to Constructed writing systems

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest