The writing is cursive Latin handwriting. It comes from Caesarea in Mauretania and dates back to the 2nd Century AD. The text is an acknowledgement of debt.
It looks semitic: I can see letters which look like a Lamek and a peh, but it´s not a semitic script I know and I would say that it is written L-R and not R-L - look at the slant of the letters and the direction of the weight of the pen in the cross strokes. So I don´t think semitic.
but something old from the papyrus it´s written on. It´s also not greek. Stumped. Something old that is not semitic or greek.
OK I looked. Latin? Well I supose it is ancient and non-semitic
Podolsky on 17 Feb 2007 at 5:44 pm #
It looks like a Greek papyrus probably 2000 years old.
Clark on 17 Feb 2007 at 6:12 pm #
Is it a fragment of a letter from Vindolanda by any chance? In which case it would be in Latin.
Victoria on 17 Feb 2007 at 10:30 pm #
Complete guess but … how about sanskrit?
Victoria on 17 Feb 2007 at 10:32 pm #
No, wait …. Norse?
Evans Knight on 17 Feb 2007 at 11:31 pm #
theres a letter in the second line that looks like a hebrew lamed.
AR on 18 Feb 2007 at 12:57 am #
It may be an ancient middle eastern script.
Josh on 18 Feb 2007 at 1:05 am #
I say Latin- I’ve seen something like this before somehow associated with the Romans, but I can’t remember how.
Joseph Staleknight on 18 Feb 2007 at 2:34 am #
I doubt that it was Hindi. That looks more like papyrus that it’s written on, and so should be a Mediterranean language.
Yeah, definitely papyrus.
d.m.falk on 18 Feb 2007 at 5:03 am #
Aramaic.
d.m.f.
Simon on 18 Feb 2007 at 1:40 pm #
The writing is cursive Latin handwriting. It comes from Caesarea in Mauretania and dates back to the 2nd Century AD. The text is an acknowledgement of debt.
Source: http://www.lib.umich.edu/pap/exhibits/writing/latin_cursive.html
Alexandra on 19 Feb 2007 at 5:38 pm #
Latin in Roman cursive, a nightmare for any palaeography student ;)
James on 06 Apr 2007 at 4:59 pm #
It looks semitic: I can see letters which look like a Lamek and a peh, but it´s not a semitic script I know and I would say that it is written L-R and not R-L - look at the slant of the letters and the direction of the weight of the pen in the cross strokes. So I don´t think semitic.
but something old from the papyrus it´s written on. It´s also not greek. Stumped. Something old that is not semitic or greek.
OK I looked. Latin? Well I supose it is ancient and non-semitic
James