That really is not a citation.
I could be wrong, but I don't think I am; I don't think any major Ancient Egyptian Settlements (or any at all?) were near enough a body of water to see the sun rise from or set in it. To the East the closest point of the Nile is ~80 miles from the Red Sea. To the West is many times that until the Atlantic Ocean. None of them saw the sun set into the water, only the sand.
Just a side note, I was taught that Amun/Ra/Horus sailed through the sky on his boat, during the day, much like Apollo and Helios; during the night, he went through the Underworld. When we have Ra, it was night in the Underworld, and when we had night, the Underworld had day.
No offence, but I find your post really incoherent. You start off about a god name Oannes, which, according to Google, is Babylonian. Then you jump into a, in my opinion, incorrect, description of the Egyptian after life. You then have one line about a god called Oa/Eau/Ea that, as far as I can tell, is not Egyptian, Babylonian, or Canaanite. Then you move right into the Israelites's God and connect Ea with YWHW. Then Dove's Dung is somehow a commandment from God (which one at this point, I have no clue) and therefore is connected to DBR, commandment. Then you eat dove poop. I'm sorry, I just don't understand the logic.
FYI, linguists worry more about what comes out of mouths, not what goes into them.
I realize linguists worry more about the words and not the symbols they represent. However, if they were to consider the symbology behind the words perhaps they would have figured out long ago that dove dung was chick peas. They could have factored in the information that Roman armies were fueled by chick peas and that they are available in every souk in Middle East. But since they don't worry about what goes INTO their mouths, they end up with rediculous concepts like bug shit.