All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
  Print view

nDaña
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat 01 May 2010 3:07 am 
Offline

Joined:Sat 18 Apr 2009 11:16 pm
Posts:35
I've had a pet project lately in my Calculus classes: nDaña.

It's all really new and there's not much developed yet, but I think it will come out real good.

Plus, it's my first conlang to be accompanied by a conscript! Yay, that's right ^^ Finally some char art I feel like is worth putting up here.

Let's get to it:

Vowels are
Code:
[a i o u]


Consonants are (In nDaña collation with standard Latin transcription):

Code:
[m]: M
[n]: N
[ɲ]: Ñ
[m͡b]: mB
[n͡d]: nD
[ŋ͡ɡ]: nG
[p]: P
[t]: T
[k]: K
[ʔ]: '
[t͡s]: C
[t͡ʃ]: Č
[θ]: Ŧ
[ʃ]: Š
[x]: X
[ʁ]: Ħ
[ʁ͡r]: Ř
[ɦ]: H
[w]: W
[l]: L
[j]: Y
[r]: R
[ʢ]: J
[ɬ]: S


This phonology is very much attached to the script, and unfortunately it is not yet online. As soon as I find my camera's cable I'll post it.


A little bit of grammar:

Basic word order is OSV. Don't know how these languages handle relative clauses though, so I'll have to look into that.

We have four marked cases, ACC, GEN, LOC and DAT. Nominative is just left unmarked. I thought about going Ergative-Absolutive on this one but I think I'll hold it to the next.

Personal pronouns come in Subjective, Objective and Possessive flavor.

Subjectives are:

1.S. ma
2.S. ña
3.S. nda (male) ndaŧ (female)

1.P. miña
2.P. siña
3.P. nda'a (male) ndaŧya (female) ndaña (generic)


Well, I'll post some more later. For now, Imma concentrate myself on my cable's searches :-)

What do you people think? :-)


Top
 Profile  
 

Re: nDaña
PostPosted: Sat 01 May 2010 3:26 am 
Offline

Joined:Sun 19 Apr 2009 9:02 am
Posts:1003
adelgado wrote:
We have four marked cases, ACC, GEN, LOC and DAT. Nominative is just left unmarked. I thought about going Ergative-Absolutive on this one but I think I'll hold it to the next.

Personal pronouns come in Subjective, Objective and Possessive flavor.

Why the mismatch between noun case and pronoun case? I would expect a language with accusative and dative marking in nouns to minimally distinguish accusative and dative in pronouns as well.

_________________
english*deutsch*nederlands*català*castellano*gaelainn*cymraeg*français*svenska*韓國말*漢語


Top
 Profile  
 

Re: nDaña
PostPosted: Sat 01 May 2010 3:39 am 
Offline

Joined:Sat 18 Apr 2009 11:16 pm
Posts:35
No specific reason, actually. I didn't even realised that my pronoun cases fitted in my noun cases. I could build dative pronouns, I guess.

In any case, here follow the Objective Pronouns:

1.S. Mir
2.S. Ŧir
3.S. nDir
1.P. Miraña
2.P. Siraña
3.P. nDina

And the possessives:

1.S. Maji
2.S. Ñaji
3.S. nDaji
1.P. Miñaji
2.P. Siñaji
3.P. nDañaji

Time to build some datives!


Top
 Profile  
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


  Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
 
20 Pamplemousses hotels DirectRooms


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group