ErzsebetGilbert wrote:
Interesting indeed! Actually, Hungarian also has different ways of assigning possession, and differentiates plural objects.
The
Sharma language has a certain part of its linguistic self
inspired by the
Hungarian tongue.
ErzsebetGilbert wrote:
In fact, in the mid-nineteenth century a Hungarian scholar named Korosi Csoma Sandor became very interested in these correspondences, and because particularly at the time the history of Magyarul and Uralic tongues has been uncertain, he traveled on foot on a cross-Eurasia trip to the monasteries of Tibet in order to study this.
Thank you for these informations.
ErzsebetGilbert wrote:
He compiled the first Tibetan dictionary and documented much of the spirituality, linguistics, and tales he learnt from the lamas. But in the north of Hungary there is a Buddhist stupa named for him, which has been blessed by the Dalai Lama, and my husband and I go to visit it. It's luminous! And he seems to have been a brilliant and devoted scholar.
Actually, he compiled the
first tibetan dictionary
for westerners but,
not the
first tibetan dictionary known. Before his time, there were countless tibetan dictionaries compiled
for tibetans by tibetans, and then, there are those compiled by the chinese and other
himalayans.
Still, Korosi Csoma Sandor's deeds
cannot be denied, nor are his deeds dwarved in any means in reference to other schalors. He is indeed a pioneer for the westerners of whom, took a daring step into a
new frontier.
