Kloiten wrote:What do you think of the Book? I think it would be real.
They also claim that a forgery of such authenticity would require greater talent than Mirolyubov had, and that there was no personal gain for him, apart from nationalistic pride, in forging the book.
Apparently proponents explain away these discrepancies by attributing them to dialectal differences, but why would these stylistic differences match modern usage? That's a leap for the delusional.dtp883 wrote:While I know little to nothing about Slavic Languages, to me, the most compelling evidence against it that they stated was the use of medieval and modern vocabulary which can't really be explained away with dialectal differences.
Delodephius wrote:I think you heard about the 'Veda Slovena'
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest