<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Omniglot homepage</title>
	<link>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/</link>
	<description>language-related musings - one language is never enough / no n'hi ha prou amb una llengua</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 03:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jacob Zuiderveen</title>
		<link>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-84554</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-84554</guid>
					<description>I like the additions made in the new homepage but it looks cluttered. In order to make it work you need some order to the links and some visual contrast: not just blue text. Some illistrations would be nice!
Keep Working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the additions made in the new homepage but it looks cluttered. In order to make it work you need some order to the links and some visual contrast: not just blue text. Some illistrations would be nice!<br />
Keep Working.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Caenwyr</title>
		<link>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-84507</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-84507</guid>
					<description>What I did like about the new page was the immediate links to what's new, even though I'm afraid even that will damage the perfectly clean look of the &quot;classic&quot;, well-appreciated home page.  Maybe you could add the most recently added conscripts, audio files, articles etc below the &quot;what's new&quot; line, in the same discreet style of the rest of the page.  

But I must say, the idea of no changes at all doesn't bother me, but maybe I'm just being conservative ;-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I did like about the new page was the immediate links to what&#8217;s new, even though I&#8217;m afraid even that will damage the perfectly clean look of the &#8220;classic&#8221;, well-appreciated home page.  Maybe you could add the most recently added conscripts, audio files, articles etc below the &#8220;what&#8217;s new&#8221; line, in the same discreet style of the rest of the page.  </p>
<p>But I must say, the idea of no changes at all doesn&#8217;t bother me, but maybe I&#8217;m just being conservative ;-).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: renato figueiredo</title>
		<link>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-84479</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-84479</guid>
					<description>I like the section what's new, is faster to find new informations, in spite of having lots of info at the same time. I liked, We don't need to click several times on links, to see what we need. It is everything in one place. New page is my vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the section what&#8217;s new, is faster to find new informations, in spite of having lots of info at the same time. I liked, We don&#8217;t need to click several times on links, to see what we need. It is everything in one place. New page is my vote.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-83876</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-83876</guid>
					<description>Thanks a lot for all your comments. I'm inclined to keep the old homepage as it is and to make the new one into a sitemap.

Some of you mentioned that you'd like a few more links on the current homepage - which ones?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for all your comments. I&#8217;m inclined to keep the old homepage as it is and to make the new one into a sitemap.</p>
<p>Some of you mentioned that you&#8217;d like a few more links on the current homepage - which ones?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ronald Kyrmse</title>
		<link>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-83797</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-83797</guid>
					<description>I must agree with what some of the above readers said: Use the new proposal (or a version thereof) as your sitemap!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must agree with what some of the above readers said: Use the new proposal (or a version thereof) as your sitemap!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Philip</title>
		<link>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-83722</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-83722</guid>
					<description>Prefer your original site.  The new format is to sterile, and far too corporate.  

Some revision of the present site may be of use.

I'm happy to have found your blog in the first place.  Please keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prefer your original site.  The new format is to sterile, and far too corporate.  </p>
<p>Some revision of the present site may be of use.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy to have found your blog in the first place.  Please keep it up!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alf</title>
		<link>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-83671</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 04:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-83671</guid>
					<description>I've used and loved your site for many years now.  I agree that you can keep the simplicity (and elegance) of the original index page while perhaps adding a few extra links.  The changing image on the &quot;classic&quot; index page is very pleasing too.  Its iconic of your site actually.

I've used your site in linguistics and language classes I teach to middle school students.  It's always been very easy to navigate.  Please don't succumb to the temptation of clutter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used and loved your site for many years now.  I agree that you can keep the simplicity (and elegance) of the original index page while perhaps adding a few extra links.  The changing image on the &#8220;classic&#8221; index page is very pleasing too.  Its iconic of your site actually.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used your site in linguistics and language classes I teach to middle school students.  It&#8217;s always been very easy to navigate.  Please don&#8217;t succumb to the temptation of clutter.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Jason Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-83578</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-83578</guid>
					<description>I just found Omniglot, so I don't know what it looked like before. But I can say that it looks fine now. It's easy to navigate and read. So many sites do dumb things like dark blue text on a black background. At least you have common sense, and the design tells me you have a sense of good design.

I was looking for tips and tricks for entering IPA with a computer, a problem which a team of grad students have attempted to address (see website). We started it because we finally became disgusted at the pathetic efforts of today's students - handing in papers with the characters written in by hand, for example. And professors are sometimes not much better. 

So if you have any favorite ways you enter IPA on your computer, we'd love to hear about it.

PS, we're halfway around the planet from Brighton. But we're only next door via the internet. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found Omniglot, so I don&#8217;t know what it looked like before. But I can say that it looks fine now. It&#8217;s easy to navigate and read. So many sites do dumb things like dark blue text on a black background. At least you have common sense, and the design tells me you have a sense of good design.</p>
<p>I was looking for tips and tricks for entering IPA with a computer, a problem which a team of grad students have attempted to address (see website). We started it because we finally became disgusted at the pathetic efforts of today&#8217;s students - handing in papers with the characters written in by hand, for example. And professors are sometimes not much better. </p>
<p>So if you have any favorite ways you enter IPA on your computer, we&#8217;d love to hear about it.</p>
<p>PS, we&#8217;re halfway around the planet from Brighton. But we&#8217;re only next door via the internet. :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Declan</title>
		<link>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-83508</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-83508</guid>
					<description>The new one is a little too cluttered, but it is a nice idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new one is a little too cluttered, but it is a nice idea.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: xarxa</title>
		<link>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-83376</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2008/04/14/omniglot_homepage/#comment-83376</guid>
					<description>yeah, a site-map link sounds like the way to go</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, a site-map link sounds like the way to go
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
