<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tones and genes</title>
	<link>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2007/05/31/tones_and_genes/</link>
	<description>language-related musings - one language is never enough / ét sprog er aldrig nok</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2007/05/31/tones_and_genes/#comment-50251</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2007/05/31/tones_and_genes/#comment-50251</guid>
					<description>The continental scandinavian languages are tonal.  Do Swedes have these genes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The continental scandinavian languages are tonal.  Do Swedes have these genes?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Minstrel Ayreon</title>
		<link>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2007/05/31/tones_and_genes/#comment-49004</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2007/05/31/tones_and_genes/#comment-49004</guid>
					<description>I will be interested to see what the &quot;one-world-language&quot; theorists do with this one.  I can easily imagine how such theorists might claim that when the Indo-European and Semitic-speaking populations lost the genes that made tonal languages favorable, their language groups branched away from whatever the &quot;world language&quot; was.  I don't think I put that very clearly...basically, somebody may now try to claim that the Sino-Tibetan languages, and some African languages, are in fact related to the non-tonal languages in some obscure way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be interested to see what the &#8220;one-world-language&#8221; theorists do with this one.  I can easily imagine how such theorists might claim that when the Indo-European and Semitic-speaking populations lost the genes that made tonal languages favorable, their language groups branched away from whatever the &#8220;world language&#8221; was.  I don&#8217;t think I put that very clearly&#8230;basically, somebody may now try to claim that the Sino-Tibetan languages, and some African languages, are in fact related to the non-tonal languages in some obscure way.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BG</title>
		<link>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2007/05/31/tones_and_genes/#comment-48935</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.omniglot.com/blog/2007/05/31/tones_and_genes/#comment-48935</guid>
					<description>I hope I have the correct genes for learning tonal languages since I might be studying Chinese next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope I have the correct genes for learning tonal languages since I might be studying Chinese next year.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
